Saturday 20 September 2014

In Good Faith

*
*
You may do so in good faith, however referring to us muslims who are not part of a terrorist organisation as 'moderate muslims' is just wrong. There can be no such thing. You are either a muslim or not. Surely if there is any meaning to our existence it must involve spiritual aspiration of a kind. Our spiritual growth is determined only by how we choose to allow the process to develop in our journey through this life. We each abide by our faith through personal and individual intuitiveness and either allow our faith to guide and refine our spirituality or then allow our ego to pollute it.

If you wish to label people of a religious faith according to the degree of their piety you would have to have Xray vision of a kind, for to judge them by how they appear is neither here nor there.
Furthermore, 'extremism' does not automatically denote terrorism, and neither should the term 'fundamentalism' do so. For what may appear to be a very strong adherence to the core of religious practices, IF it is not warped, IF it includes the fundamental reliance upon His Mercy and Grace, IF it exists parallel to the belief that religion begins with doing onto others as you would have done onto yourself, then with all these IFs and perhaps a few more, then it is merely to be regarded as a form of prayer, a form of surrender to the One and Only, a form of being true to how a person perceives their own faith. With all IFs in place, the only automatic assumption that could take place would be the following: There can be no coercion~ there can be no judgement and there can be absolutely no terrorism involved.

... "and he said 'as for what you are doing today; fighting for political power, fighting for dominion, this is NOT what the Qur-an is talking about'" ~ Now we have young people joining the 'khilafa' from everywhere... this is madness, complete insanity~and the prophet pbuh addresses this concept with: 'WHAT are you? The 'what' not 'who' deliberately meant to imply 'no intellect'~
 'DON'T BE FOOLED BY THEIR PIETY'
If you look at the verses where Allah grants permission for you to fight.. permission, a licence, not something 'desirable' ~
'If you're confused then you haven't studied this religion, and if you think this has anything to do with the truth, then you definitely haven't studied this religion.'

If you want to understand those verses and see what they infer and refer to then watch this video. 
CONTAINS EXPLANATORY PHRASES IN ENGLISH
The amount of times we are asked why does it say that in the Qur-an, all taken out of context... this provides the considered response: 

 The Crisis of ISIS: A Prophetic Prediction | Sermon by Hamza Yusuf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJo4B-yaxfk#t=1106 
The above, an analysis of amazing revelations through the Qur-an... giving so much insight to any inklings of intuitive responses we may all have.

And here is an MEM article... food for thought: 
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/articles/middle-east/14126-demonising-the-brotherhood-will-not-help-in-the-fight-against-isis

youtube link submitted via Facebook by Shereen Abdel Fattah and Mahmoud Ibrahim

* Island Mosque /Corniche Jeddah, SA/~ Architect Abdel-Wahed El-Wakil
 http://blog.classicist.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/221.jpg 
  http://farm1.staticflickr.com/137/355228933_27a69a6fd7_b.jpg 

Wednesday 6 August 2014

Island Mentality? (links added on)



With love for country aside, before we are any nationality I like to think we may be human and have some moral fibre even if we seem unable to drum up enough compassion to defend those who need our support, in principle and theory at the very least.
Before we can say we are not responsible for what is going on in Palestine we really should consider Zionism and the manner in which it has managed to thrive. Heavily backed by the US Israel has done nothing other than transgress, transgress, transgress.
 

Before we can possibly say we are unaffected and therefore cannot afford to care ‘too much’ hence shall remain impartial, we should really know that that ship has sailed long ago. Britain has not been impartial and has played its part in history and if it is not willing to take sides in this conflict then where exactly does it stand?

A silly question we might say, if profit from arms sales is dropped into the equation.

But just for the sake of argument:

Israel states loud and clear that it will not and shall not bow to international law; surely that alone should warrant that all of us who strive to abide by such could not, in all good faith, possibly take a political stand of abstention… Or perhaps we see those laws as quite superfluous?  

Taking sides does not have to be about engaging ourselves in conflict but rather about ‘standing up’ for what is morally acceptable. That alone should appear to be our only prerogative.

With an occupier/ oppressor; terrorising civilians left right and centre, how can we not expect an element of those occupied to fight back? 
How can we label that element alone a terrorist when terror is what created it? 
Hamas is largely dismissed when it comes to negotiations of ceasefire... Should we perhaps only negotiate with Israel who believes it has the right to implement major military force against the very people it has been evicting for so long, killing and maiming in the process? ~ Using weaponry so sophisticated and yet with such perverse accuracy killing civilians, mainly children..  and in the process allowing itself to consider the casualties as mere collateral damage?

  ~ Israel's iron dome courtesy of the USA ~
http://www.alleywatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Page-5-graphic.png
With occupier continuing to glean from what can only be termed as stolen property; continuing to persecute, kill and maim the people it, as occupier, has a duty to protect, we can only assume we have nothing against the heavily armed robber concept who decides to get rid of the problem by killing all its hostages.


All the above must sit right with us, otherwise, how could the UK in possession of any moral fibre give itself the liberty to deem itself impartial...

“My country, to its shame, follows the bully that is the United States,” said Loach. “But we are not powerless. We can act together.”
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/aug/25/ken-loach-calls-for-cultural-boycott-of-israel?CMP=twt_gu

  
"With Gaza’s land mass shrinking due to Israeli military action, it’s about time someone asked: What is the end game?... Look at the region's maps from recent history. Look at the steady erosion of Palestinian land and the acquisition of land by Israel, and you can understand that the present attack on Gaza is not about solely about Hamas. It’s about land. It isn’t just about Hamas’s rockets. It’s about land. It isn’t just about Hamas’s tunnels. It’s about land. It isn’t about kidnappings. It is about land. It isn’t even about meeting a housing crisis in Israel. It is about grabbing land from the Palestinians in Gaza and the natural resources that go with the land, upon the occasion of Israel’s military invasion of Gaza."
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/05/gaza-buffer-zone-dennis-kucinich

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxDYiBls99w 
video clip: FREEDOM FOR PALESTINE 

Image from FB One Spark Foundation


Non-profit Organisation